John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur
Research Network on Socioeconomic Status and Health

bar

 

Home
Network Mission
Network Members
Research
Publications
Links
 

CATECHOLAMINES AND ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS

 

Summary prepared by Ulf Lundberg, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University for the Allostatic Load notebook. Last revised September, 2003.

Table of Contents
a. Background
b. Catecholamines and health
c. Assessment
d. Methodological considerations
e. Gender differences
f. Relevance for allostasis
g. References

Background

Research on the sympathetic adrenal-medullary (SAM) system has its roots in the work by Walter B. Cannon in the beginning of this century (Cannon, 1914). On the basis of animal experiments, he described the fight-or-flight response or the emergency function of the adrenal medulla. The SAM system is activated when the individual is challenged in its control of the environment (Fig. 1, Henry, 1992). Via hypothalamus and the sympathetic nervous system, psychological stress stimulates the adrenal medulla to secrete the two catecholamines, epinephrine (adrenaline) and norepinephrine (noradrenalin), into the blood stream. This defence reaction prepares the body for battle.

Figure 1

The cardiovascular and neuroendocrine functions activated by the SAM system are aimed at mobilizing energy to the muscles and the heart and, at the same time, reducing blood flow to the internal organs and the gastro-intestinal system. In response to physical threat, this is an efficient means for survival by increasing the organism's capacity for fight or flight. Today, however, the SAM system is more often challenged by threats of a social or mental rather than physical nature. Short term activation of this system is necessary for adequate coping with environmental demands and for protection of the body, whereas possible health consequences of intense, repeated and/or sustained activation of this psychobiological program in response to psychosocial demands is a major objective for stress research and relevant for allostasis.

Numerous studies from laboratory experiments as well as from various natural settings illustrate the sensitivity of the SAM system to various psychosocial conditions, such as daily stress at work, at home, at school, at day-care centers, at hospitals, on commuter trains, on buses etc. (see reviews by Mason, 1968; Levi, 1972; Henry & Stephens, 1977; Ursin et al., 1978; Frankenhaeuser 1979; 1983; Usdin et al., 1980; Axelrode and Reisine, 1984; Lundberg, 1984).

Catecholamines and healthTop

The catecholamines and their concomitant effects on other physiological functions, such as blood pressure, heart rate and lipolysis, may serve as objective indicators of the stress that an individual is exposed to. However, these bodily effects are also assumed to link psychosocial stress to increased health risks. Longlasting elevated catecholamine levels are considered to contribute to the development of atherosclerosis and predispose to myocardial ischemia (Karasek et al., 1982; Krantz & Manuck, 1984; Rozanski et al., 1988). The elevated catecholamine levels also make the blood more prone to clotting, thus, reducing the risk of heavy bleeding in case of tissue damage but, at the same time, increasing the risk of arterial obstruction and myocardial infarcfion. The role of the catecholamines in hypertension is also of great interest (e.g., Nelesen & Dimsdale, 1994).

Less is known about the role of the catecholamines in other health problems. However, in the study of psychosocial aspects of musculoskeletal disorders (e.g., Moon & Sauter, 1996), it is generally assumed that psychological stress plays an important role by influencing various bodily functions including muscle tension and, thus, form a link to neck, shoulder and back pain problems (Lundberg & Melin, 2002). In keeping with this, jobs with a high prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders, such as repetitive assembly line work, are characterized by highly elevated sympathetic arousal (cf. Table 3) and slow unwinding after work (Johansson et al., 1978; Melin et al., 1997). In addition, in a laboratory experiment (Lundberg et al., 1994), positive correlations were found between blood pressure, norepinephrine and mentally induced EMG activity of the trapezius muscle.

AssessmentTop

A small but relatively constant fraction of the circulating levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine in the blood is excreted into the urine (Frankenhaeuser, 1971; Levi, 1972). Consequently, assessment can be made in blood (usually plasma) as well as in urine. However, whereas epinephrine is mainly produced by the adrenal medulla, the major part of the circulating norepinephrine is produced by sympathetic nerve endings. Studies comparing urinary levels with corresponding hormone determinations in plasma are scarce, but available data indicates a significant positive relationship between changes in urinary and plasma catecholamines (Akerstedt et al., 1983; Steptoe, 1985).

For obvious reasons, plasma reflects short term stress and acute stress responses more readily than urinary measurements. Urinary values provide integrated measurements for extended periods of time (usually an hour or more), which is an advantage in the study of long term (chronic) psychosocial stress (Baum et al., 1987). Additional advantages of urinary measurements in the study of psychosocial stress are that urine samples are relatively easy to collect, also in field studies, they do not interfere with the subject's normal habits and environment and they cause no harm or pain. The characteristics of plasma and urine measurements are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Characteristics of Catecholamine Assessment in Urine and Blood (Plasma)

Urinary measurements
~Cause no pain or harm
~Do not influence the  individual's normal behavior or environment
~Relatively easy to collect
~Integrated measurements are obtained for longer periods of time
Blood measurements
~Measurements can be obtained with short intervals
~Can be experienced as unpleasant and influence catecholamine output
~May affect the normal work situation
~A trained nurse is needed
Summary of advantages (+) and disadvantages (-) in different types of studies
Urine Plasma
Acute stress
Chronic stress
Laboratory experiments
Field studies
-
+
0
+
+
-
+
-

The amount of urinary catecholamines excreted during a particular period of time can be determined from the concentration in the sample, multiplied by the total urine volume, or by relating the concentration to a reference substance such as creatinine excretion. Provided that reliable measurements are obtained and the subject is able to empty his/her bladder completely, the results from the different methods are almost identical. The catecholamines are usually determined by high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (Lundberg et al., 1988; Hjemdahl et al., 1990).

Methodological considerationsTop

The catecholamines have a pronounced diurnal pattern which has to be taken into account in the assessment of the stress response. Under normal sleep/wake conditions, the catecholamines peak in the middle of the day and reach their lowest levels during night sleep. Epinephrine has an endogenous pattern which remains relatively stable even during several nights of sleep deprivation (Akerstedt, 1979), whereas norepinephrine is more influenced by physical activity. Consistent changes in the sleep/wake pattern, e.g., habitual night work, will completely reverse the circadian rhythm of the catecholamines in about a week. Other non-psychological factors influencing catecholamine secretion are the intake of caffeine (coffee), alcohol and nicotine (cigarette smoking), medication (beta blockers, diuretics etc.) and heavy physical exercise (Table 2).

Table 2. Non-psychological factors influencing catecholamine levels.

Of great importance
~Circadian rhythms (time of day)
~NIcotine (e.g., cigarette smoking)
~Caffeine (coffee, tea)
~Medication (betablockers, diuretics)
Of some importance
~Phase of the menstrual cycle
~Gender
~Body weight
~Food intake

The increase in catecholamine levels in the blood occurs within minutes in response to an acute stressor and may vary considerably depending on the mental and physical load on the individual. Individual variations in baseline levels are also pronounced. The highest epinephrine level in a random sample of individuals may be 10 times greater than the lowest. However, individual catecholamine levels are relatively stable over time (Forsman & Lundberg, 1982). During mild stress, the epinephrine output increases about 2-3 times the resting level, whereas during more severe stress, e.g., during child birth (Alehagen et al., 1999), mean epinephrine levels rise 8-10 times the resting level, or much more in individual cases. There are no "normal" catecholamine levels, although pathological levels can be found in association with, e.g., adrenal tumours.

In order to reduce the influence of circadian rhythms and individual differences in baseline levels, it is recommended to express individual responses to stress in relation to his/her corresponding baseline level obtained during relaxation at the same time of the day on another day. Thus, percent change from baseline is usually a more relevant measure than absolute levels.

Gender differencesTop

In stress research, like in many other research areas, most studies have been performed on men. However, in the early 1970's, investigators in Marianne Frankenhaeuser's group in Stockholm started to compare stress responses of males and females. In these early studies of sex differences in psychophysiological stress responses, it was consistently found that women were less reactive than men in terms of epinephrine secretion during experimental stress (e.g., Frankenhaeuser, Dunne & Lundberg, 1976; Johansson, 1972). Although women performed as well or usually even better than men on the various stress tests, they did not increase their epinephrine secretion very much. However, during more intense stress, such as a stressful examination (Frankenhaeuser, Rauste von Wright et al., 1978), female students were found to increase their epinephrine output significantly but, still, to a lesser extent than the male students did.

A possible explanation for these sex differences is that performance stress is less challenging to women than to men. Emotional stress has been found to have a more pronounced effect on catecholamine levels in women (Lundberg, de Châ teau, Winberg & Frankenhaeuser, 1981) and women in less traditional roles seem to respond to performance stress with the same epinephrine output as their male colleagues (Collins & Frankenhaeuser, 1978). More recent studies comparing men and women matched for education and occupational level show that women may respond by as much epinephrine output at work and during experimental stress as men do (e.g., Frankenhaeuser et al., 1989).

Although, the possible influence of biological factors, such as steroid sex hormones on catecholamine responses, cannot be excluded (Wasilewska, Kobus and Bargiel, 1980; Tersman, Collins and Eneroth, 1991), it seems as if psychological factors and gender role patterns are more important than biological factors for the sex differences in catecholamine responses.

In men, a significant positive correlation is usually found between perceived stress and physiological responses at work (e.g., Lundberg, Granqvist, Hansson, Magnusson & Wallin, 1989; Frankenhaeuser et al., 1962; Frankenhaeuser et al., 1989). However, in women, physiological stress levels at work seem to spill over into non-work situations (Rissler, 1977; Frankenhaeuser et al., 1989; Lundberg, 1996; Lundberg & Frankenhaeuser, 1999). This interaction between stress from paid employment and unpaid work at home is important to consider in the study of women's stress.

Relevance for allostasisTop

Epinephrine levels are significantly elevated by overstimulation as well as by understimulation compared to more optimal environmental conditions (Frankenhaeuser et al., 1971; Levi, 1972; Frankenhaeuser & Gardell, 1976). Work overload, a very high work pace, too much responsibility, and role conflicts as well as simple, monotonous and repetitive jobs or lack of meaningful activities (e.g., unemployment), may contribute to elevated epinephrine levels.

The acute response ("phasic" elevation according to Ursin et al., 1978) to a novel environmental situation diminishes as the individual habituates but, in contrast to cortisol levels which seem to return to baseline (Pollard, 1995), catecholamine levels remain chronically elevated also during normal work conditions ("tonic" elevation according to Ursin et al., 1978).

One example of an adequate or economic response to mental stress is presented in Fig. 2 (Forsman, 1983), which shows the epinephrine changes of healthy male students during successive periods of experimental stress and rest in the laboratory. The subjects were able to return to their baseline level each time the stress exposure ended.

Figure 2

Another example is shown in Fig. 3, illustrating the epinephrine output of 50 women giving birth to their first chld (Alehagen et al., 1999). Despite a 500 percent increase during labor and pushing, the epinephrine levels had returned to the pregnancy levels after a couple of days.

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 4 illustrates the lack of unwinding (norepinephrine) among female managers after a day at work compared to their male colleagues (Lundberg & Frankenhaeuser, 1999) and, Fig. 5 shows the correlation between catecholamine levels at work and at home in women and men (Frankenhaeuser et al., 1989).

Figure 5

Fig. 6 shows how a period of overtime (on Saturdays) at work during several weeks influenced the epinephrine levels in the evening (measured on Wednesdays) in female white collar workers (Rissler, 1977). Fig. 7 shows how overtime at work is correlated with epinephrine output during the weekend at home in full-time employed mothers, but not fathers, of preschool children (Lundberg & Palm, 1989). It is of interest to note that Alfredsson et at. (1985) found that overtime at work was associated with elevated risk of myocardial infarction in women but not in men.

Figure 6

Figure 7

Whereas epinephrine output is mainly influenced by mental stress, norepinephrine is more sensitive to physical activity and body posture. Comparisons of work stress in blue and white collar workers are consistent with experimental findings as shown in Table 3, where data from a series of real life studies are summarized. It is shown that male and female managers, and male and female clerical workers, increase their epinephrine but not their norepinephrine levels at work, whereas assembly workers and supermarket cashiers increase both their epinephrine and norepinephrine levels compared to their normal resting levels (=100). The physical activity of the white collar workers is probably too low to influence norepinephrine output.

Table 3. Catecholamine Responses in Different Occupations (Increase from Non-work Level)

Epinephrine Norepinephrine
Managers men
women
++
+
+
0
Clerical workers men
women
+
++
0
0
Assembly workers men
women
++++
++
++
++
Assembly line workers men +++ ++++
Cashiers women +++ +++
+ < 25%, ++25<50%, +++50<75%, ++++75<100%

Considering the various cardiovascular and metabolic functions influenced by the catecholamines, this means that blue collar workers in general are exposed to a greater total physiological load than white collar workers. In addition, workers in repetitive jobs seem to have difficulties to unwind after work, i.e., their physiological arousal remains elevated at least 1-2 hours after work compared to the rapid unwinding of workers in more flexible jobs (Johansson et al., 1978; Lundberg et al., 1993; Melin et al., 1997). This means that workers in simple, monotonous and repetitive jobs not only have to pay a greater physiological toll at work but also have less chance for relaxation and recovery off the job (Melin & Lundberg, 1997). Physical stressors at work such as noise may further contribute to the total load on blue collar workers (Glass & Singer, 1972).

In view of traditional gender differences in responsibility for unpaid work at home (Hall, 1990; Kahn, 1991; Lundberg et al., 1994), the long term health risks for women in repetitive work seem to be of particular importance (Rcpetti et al., 1989; Rodin & Ickovics, 1990; Frankenhaeuser et al., 1991).

Referencestoc.gif (1022 bytes)

Akerstedt, T. (1979) Altered sleep/wake patterns and circadian rhythms. Laboratory and field studies of sympathomedullary and related variables. Acta Physiological Scandinavia, Suppl. 469.

Akerstedt, T., Gillberg, M., Hjemdahl, P., Sigurdson, K., Gustavsson, I., Daleskog, M., Pollare, T. (1983) Comparison of urinary and plasma catecholamine responses to mental stress. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 117: 19-26.

Alehagen, S., Wijma, K., Lundberg, U., Melin, B., & Wijma, B. (2001).Catecholamine and cortisol reaction to child birth. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 8, 50-65.

Alfredsson, L., Spetz C-L., and Theorell, T. (1985). Type of occupation and near-future hospitalization for myocardial infarction and some other diagnoses. International Journal of Epidemiology, 14,378-388.

Axelrod, J., and Reisine, T.D. (1984). Stress hormones: Their interaction and regulation. Science, 224.

Baum, A., Lundberg, U., Grunberg, N., Singer, J., and Gatchel, R. (1985 ). Urinary catecholamines in behavioral research in stress. C.R. Lake & M.G. Ziegler (Eds.), The Catecholamines in Psychiatric and Neurologic Disorders. Ann Arbor, Butterworths, pp. 55-72.

Cannon, W.B. (1914) The emergency function of the adrenal medulla in pain and the major emotions. American Journal of Physiology 33: 356-372.

Collins, A. & Frankenhaeuser, M. (1978). Stress responses in male and female engineering students. Journal of Human Stress, 4, 43-48.

Forsman, L. (1983). Individual and group differences in psychophysiological responses to stress - with emphasis on sympathetic-adrenal medullary and pituitary-adrenal cortical responses. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University.

Forsman, L. & Lundberg, U. (1982). Consistency in cathecolamine and cortisol excretion in males and females. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 17, 555-562.

Frankenhaeuser, M., Lundberg, U., Augustson, H., Nilsson, S., Hedman, H., Wahlström, K. (1989). Stress, health, job satisfaction. A summary of research projects on stress and the psychosocial work environment. Stockholm: The Swedish Work Environment Fund.

Frankenhaeuser, M., Gardell, B. (1976) Underload and overload in working life: Outline of a multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Human Stress 2: 35-46.

Frankenhaeuser, M., Lundberg, U. & Chesney, M. (1991). Women, work and health. Stress and opportunities, New York: Plenum Press.

Frankenhaeuser, M. (1983). The sympathetic-adrenal and pituitary-adrenal response to challenge: comparison between the sexes. In T. M. Dembroski, T. H. Schmidt & G. Blümchen (Eds.) Biobehavioral bases of coronary heart disease. (pp. 91-105). Basel, New York: Karger.

Frankenhaeuser, M. (1971) Behavior and circulating catecholamines. Brain Research, 31: 241-262.

Frankenhaeuser, M. Dunne, E. & Lundberg, U. (1976). Sex differences in sympathetic adrenal medullary reactions induced by different stressors. Psychopharmacology, 47, 1-5.

Frankenhaeuser, M., Rauste-von Wright, M., Collins, A., von Wright, J., Sedvall, G. & Swahn, C.-G. (1978). Sex differences in psychoneuroendocrine reactions to examination stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 40, 334-343.

Frankenhaeuser, M., Lundberg, U., Fredrikson, M., Melin, B., Tuomisto, M., Myrsten, A-L., Hedman, M., Bergman-Losman, B. & Wallin, L. (1989). Stress on and off the job as related to sex and occupational status in white-collar workers. Journal of organizational behavior, 10, 321-346.

Frankenhaeuser, M., Nordheden, B., Myrsten, A.-L., Post, B. (1971) Psychophysiological reactions to understimulation and overstimulation. Acta Psychologica 35: 298-308.

Frankenhaeuser, M., Sterky, K., Järpe, G. (1962) Psychophysiological relations in habituation to gravitational stress. Perceptual and Motor Skills 15: 63-72.

Glass, D.C., & Singer, J.E. (1972). Urban Stress. New York: Academic Press.

Hall, E. M. (1990). Womens work: an inquiry into the health effects of invisible and visible labour. Doctoral Dissertation, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm.

Henry, J.P. (1992) Biological basis of the stress response. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 1: 66-83.

Henry, J.P., and Stephens, P.M. (1977). Stress, Health, and the Social Environment. A Sociobiologic Approach to Medicine. New York, Heidelberg & Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Hjemdahl, P., Larsson, P.T., Bradley, T., Akerstedt, T., Anderzén, I., Sigurdsson, K., Gillberg, M., and Lundberg, U. (1989). Catecholamine measurements in urine with high-performance liquid chromatography with amperometric detection - comparison with an autoanalyser fluorescence method. Journal of Chromatography, 494, 53-66.

Johansson, G. (1972) Sex differences in the catecholamine output of children. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 86: 569-572.

Johansson, G., Aronsson, G., Lindstrom, B.O. (1978) Social psychological and neuroendocrine stress reactions in highly mechanized work. Ergonomics 21: 583-599.

Johansson, G., Collins, A., and Collins, V.P. (1983). Male and female psychoneuroendocrine response to examination stress: A case report. Motivation and Emotion, 7, 1-9.

Kahn, R. L. (1991) The forms of women's work. In M. Frankenhaeuser, U. Lundberg & M. Chesney (Eds.) Women, work, and health. Stress and opportunities. New York: Plenum Press, 65-84.

Karasek, R.A., Russell, R.S., and Theorell, T. (1982). Physiology of stress and regeneration in job related cardiovascular illness. Journal of Human Stress, 8, 29-42.

Krantz, D.S., and Manuck, S.B. (1984). Acute psychophysiologic reactivity and risk of cardiovascular disease: A review and methodologic critique. Psychological Bulletin, 96,435-464.

Levi, L. (1972) Stress and distress in reponse to psychosocial stimuli. Acta Medica Scandinavica, Suppl. 528.

Lundberg, U. (1984) Human psychobiology in Scandinavia: II Psychoneuro-endocrinology human stress and coping processes. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 25: 214-226.

Lundberg, U. (1996). The influence of paid and unpaid work on psychophysiological stress responses of men and women. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 117-130.

Lundberg, U., Granqvist, M., Hansson, T., Magnusson, M. & Wallin, L (1989). Psychological and physiological strress responses during repetitive work at an assembly line. Work & Stress, 3, 143-153.

Lundberg, U., de Château, P., Winberg, J. & Frankenhaeuser, M. (1981). Catecholamine and cortisol excretion patterns in three year old children and their parents. Journal of Human Stress, 7, 3-11.

Lundberg, U., & Frankenhaeuser, M. (1999). Stress and workload of men and women in high ranking positions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 142-151.

Lundberg, U., Holmberg, L., and Frankenhaeuser, M. (1988). Urinary catecholamines: comparison between HPLC with electrochemical detection and fluorophotometric assay. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 31, 287-290.

Lundberg, U., Kadefors, R., Melin, B., Palmerud, G., Hassmén, P., Engström, M., and Elfsberg Dohns, I. (1994). Psychophysiological stress and EMG activity of the trapezius muscle. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1, 354-370.

Lundberg, U., Melin, B., Evans, G. W., and Holmberg, L. (1993). Physiological deactivation after two contrasting tasks at a video display terminal: leaming versus repetitive data entry. Ergonomics, 36, 601-611.

Lundberg, U., and Palm, K. (1989). Workload and catecholamine excretion of in parents of preschool children. Work and Stress, 3, 255-260.

Mason, J.W. (1968). A review of psychoendocrine research on the sympathetic-adrenal medullary system. Psychosomatic Medicine 30: 631-653

Melin, B. and Lundberg, U. (1997). A psychobiological approach to work-stress and musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Psychophysiology.

Melin, B., Lundberg, U., Söderlund, J., and Granqvist, M. (1997). Psychological and physiological stress reactions of male and female assembly workers: A comparison between two different forms of work organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior.

Moon, S.D. & Sauter, S.L. (Eds.), (1996). Psychosocial Aspects of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Office Work. Taylor & Francis, London.

Nelesen, R.A., and Dimsdale, J.E. (1994). Hypertension and adrenergic functioning. In O.G. Cameron (Ed.), Adrenergic Dysfunction and Psychobiology. American Psychiatric Press, Washington.

Pollard, T. M. (1995). Use of cortisol as a stress marker: practical and theoretical problems. American Journal of Human Biology.

Repetti, R., Matthews, K.A., and Waldron, I. (1989). Employment and women's health: effects of paid employment on women's mental and physical health. American Psychologist, 44, 1394-1401.

Rissler, A. (1977) Stress reactions at work and after work during a period of quantitative overload. Ergonomics 20: 13-16.

Rodin, J., and lckovics, J.R. (1990). Women's health. Review and research agenda as we approach the 21st century. American Psychologist, 45, 1018-1034.

Rozanski, A., Bairey, C.N., Krantz, D.S., Friedman, J., Resser, K.J., Morell, M., Hilton-Chalfen, S., Hestrin, L., Bietendorf, J., and Berman, D.S. (1988). Mental stress and the induction of silent myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 318, 1005-1011.

Steptoe, A. (1985) Assessment of sympathetic nervous function in human stress research. Discussion meeting held at the Ciba Foundation, London.

Tersman, Z., Collins, A. & Eneroth, P. (1991). Cardiovascular responses to psychological and physiological stressors during the menstrual cycle. Psychosomatic Medicine, 53, 185-197.

Ursin, H., Baade, E. and Levine, S. (1978). Psychobiology of Stress. A Study of Coping Men. New York, San Francisco, and London: Academic Press.

Usdin, E., Kvetnansky, R. and Kopin, I.J. (Eds.) (1980). Catecholamines and Stress: Recent Advances. New York: Elsevier North-Holland, pp. 455-460.

Wasilewska, E., Kobus, E., and Bargiel, Z. (1980). Urinary catecholamine excretion and plasma dopamine-beta-hydroxylase activity in mental work performed in two periods of menstrual cycle in women. In E. Usdin, R. Kvetnansky & I.J. Kopin (Eds.), Catecholamines and Stress: Recent Advances. New York, Amsterdam, Oxford:Elsevier/North-Holland, pp. 549-554.

 

NextPreviousTopNotebook Table of Contents
 Copyright © 1999 UCSF
 Contact: Judith Stewart
 Revised 16 Sept. 2003
Home | Network Mission | Network Members | Research | Publications | Links